Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 15,539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 6:47 am
Stephens Church, LLC (“Lumenary”) applied for a special exception and two variances in 2017 in order to construct an assisted living facility for individuals suffering from memory-related illnesses in a Residential Low-Density Zoning District (“RLD”). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:01 pm
.'"] From Low v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
Translated into service provider obligations, when assessing risk of harm on its service the service provider might have to assume a low threshold and the most sensitive user. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:10 am
Najjar Group, LLC v West 56th Hotel LLC, recently decided by the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Bowers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 3:52 pm
The Michigan Court of Appeals recently decided Long Lake Township v Maxon, an interesting case pitting evidence gathered by a drone against a couple's right to privacy on their own property. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 10:19 am
In Kedar Nath v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:16 am
Until now.The case is Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:01 am
Not only was the plaintiff’s evidence – consisting mainly of the opinions of an outside expert with “no involvement in the relevant events” – unconvincing, but Pretium adduced evidence to rebut it.[7] Plaintiffs pursuing relief for secondary market liability would do well to evaluate the strength and weaknesses of their own evidence and consider whether pursuing a case that has a reasonable possibility of success, is worth the time and expense where there is a… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:01 am
Not only was the plaintiff’s evidence – consisting mainly of the opinions of an outside expert with “no involvement in the relevant events” – unconvincing, but Pretium adduced evidence to rebut it.[7] Plaintiffs pursuing relief for secondary market liability would do well to evaluate the strength and weaknesses of their own evidence and consider whether pursuing a case that has a reasonable possibility of success, is worth the time and expense where there is a… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity and… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity and… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In King v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 5:52 pm
Separately, in Mayorkas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:50 pm
There were citations to Scalia's Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am
The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:55 am
Newtown Preservation Society, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:21 am
"] An interesting and, I expect, important broad concurrence by Justice Kavanaugh in today's NCAA v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
There’s no heroes or villains in such a history, no high or low culture – only data. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:06 am
In Duberstein v. [read post]
