Search for: "Mark Wells " Results 2321 - 2340 of 46,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by John L. Welch
In a 107-page opinion, the Board dismissed a petition for cancellation of a registration of the mark UNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & Design (shown below) for "chamber of commerce services, namely promoting business by and among Hispanic businesses and corporate America while fostering procurement and economic development opportunities as well as commercial and financial relations by and among Hispanic businesses with the general business community" [UNITED STATES… [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:18 am by John L. Welch
The Examining Attorney is not expected to submit evidence of fame in an ex parte proceeding.And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register.TTABlog comment: Well, would you have? [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:59 am by John L. Welch
" The Board disagreed, noting the evidence of long use, extensive advertising, and extensive mention in the general press.By way of analogy, it could hardly be denied that ROLLS-ROYCE is a very well-known brand of automobile, although only a small fraction of the population can actually afford to purchase one. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:04 am by Ron Coleman
The Board also dismissed Hormel’s dilution claim on the ground that the SPAM mark, while famous for canned meats, is not “distinctive,” writing: The evidence shows that “spam,” in addition to being petitioner’s trademark, has a well-recognized meaning as a generic term for unsolicited commercial email; the term isused by consumers, the media, Congress, state legislatures and those who sell solutions for such unwanted email. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:49 am by Bob Kraft
They can’t operate on streets where the line markings are worn away—as on many of the streets in New York. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Professor Mark Liberman (Language Log) points to a line in a a Foreign Policy article by Jeffrey Lewis, referring to “the months-long twitzkrieg between North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:17 am by John L. Welch
Applicant contended that its mark includes "a most prominent design dating back centuries, symbolizing both the three crosses of Calvary (where Jesus Christ was crucified) as well as the Holy Trinity (Father, Son and Holy Spirit). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
This position is nothing new and is in line with well-established case law [IPKAT here, here and here].Thus, the court proceeded to assess the demonstration of originality of the "EI TORO LOCO" monster truck. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:16 pm
That awful fact, and the need to make sense of it, overshadowed all else Saturday, as crowds of well-wishers gathered in this Gulf Coast town to mark the third anniversary of Jessica Lunsford's kidnapping and murder. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by John L. Welch
"A specimen that shows only the mark, with no reference to the services, does not show service mark usage. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 5:11 am
It ruled that the subject mark had not acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f) and that Respondent's use of the mark had not been substantially exclusive. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:49 am by John L. Welch
" The Board found confusion likely and it affirmed the refusal to register.TTABlog comment: Well, how did you do, Judge Wanna-be? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
A decision not in Interflora's favour would arguably not sit well in the context of the rest of trade mark law given that the use of a third party's registered trade mark without their consent in other scenarios would be trade mark infringement. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:55 pm by Nikki Siesel
The parties’ marketing emphasis varied as well and this created dissimilar connotations for each mark. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
Ihalainen LLP (I'm a dreamer, what can I say), but should your name conflict with a well-known brand, such as McDonald's, the use of your own name can be tricky. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by Kevin Goldberg
Sure, they want you to avoid trademark issues, but they probably also want to protect their own – well, actually the USofA’s – interest in the mark. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 11:07 am
  My keen sense is that the parties have spent -- and now will continue to spend -- infinitely more on legal fees than this thing could ever possibly be worth.But oh well. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 4:19 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark QUERCUS COFFEE for coffee [COFFEE disclaimed], finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark QUERCUS for wine. [read post]