Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 2321 - 2340 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2012, 9:59 pm by Joey Fishkin
Briefly, here's the argument:As a matter of simple arithmetic, Texas will receive at least $9 of federal money for every $1 it puts into this program, on an ongoing basis in the “out years. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:20 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This matter is being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Christopher M. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Steven Boutwell
For example, the following endorsement limits both the length of the polluting event and requires written notice within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the event: b. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Short Answer The Court of Chancery reasoned that collateral estoppel would not apply, and motions to dismiss based on Rule 23.1 and Rule 12(b)(6) were both denied. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Hence, as regards clarity, for each chemical substance, the question arises as to which of these formulations of definition can unambiguously define the sought-for subject-matter and how the claim should enable the claimed subject-matter to be distinguished from the prior art. [4.6] Product-by-process claims fulfil the need of defining chemical substances (such as macromolecules, complex compositions), which cannot be defined by their structure but, by way of the process of their… [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:00 am by Justin P. Webb
 That is not clear - but I'm betting we are going to find out if this trend evolves into the norm. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:45 pm
  But I'm going to do so anyway.I think it's a major omission that nowhere in the Court's opinion does it mention, discuss or even cite Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3)(C). [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 11:19 am by Jon G. Brooks
Mind you, I’m not saying that once funds have been contributed to an IRA, they’re “safe” from the risks inherent in investing or the merciless ravages of a declining market—that’s another matter entirely. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:31 am by Carolyn Elefant
 Instead, any lawyer barred in State A should be permitted to represent clients in matters arising under the laws of State A, whether they work virtually from an office in state B or set up a physical shop in State B limited to State A matters. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Concepcion did not hold that all state law unconscionability defenses were preempted, only California’s essentially automatic Discover Bank rule, which conditioned the enforceability of consumer arbitration agreements on the availability of classwide arbitration, no matter how favorable the terms of the individual arbitration provisions were for consumers. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
., and their principals, Thomas Sinclair and Brian C. [read post]