Search for: "May v. May" Results 2321 - 2340 of 182,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 8:29 am by Jack Prettejohn
On 29 May 2018, the presidency of the council of the EU published its latest compromise proposal (dated 23 May 2018) for the draft Directive amending the CRD IV (CRD V). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:21 pm
Author Satoshi Nakamoto Source Wikimedia Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Mellor) Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Wright [2024] EWHC 1198 (Ch) (20 May 2024)Bitcoin was the world's first cryptocurrency, a digital currency that does not depend on a government, bank or other central institution to function. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:29 pm
The most remarkable aspect of Unilever Plc v S C Johnson & Son Inc [2012] EWPCC 19 (25 May 2012) is that this action took place in the Patents County Court rather than the Patents Court or before the Comptroller. [read post]
6 May 2025, 10:41 am
iPhonesAuthor iPhone 15 Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Newey, Arnold and Birss) Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2025] EWCA Civ 552 (1 May 2025)This was an appeal by Optis Cellular Technology LLC, Optis Wireless Technology LLC and Unwired Planet International Ltd. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:01 pm
Michael Atkins (a/k/a the Seattle Trademark Lawyer) has graciously offered to host "Meet the Bloggers V" at this year's INTA Annual Meeting in Seattle.Date: Monday, May 18 Time: 6-9 p.m. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:23 pm
The importance of Westwood v Knight [2011] EWPCC 11 (11 May 2011) is that it was the first trial under the new rules for the Patents County Court and thus the first opportunity for the court to consider the cost capping rules in the context of an entire case. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  That was enough to show standing, as required by Spokeo v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:13 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Occasionally I see claims that, under Cohen v. [read post]