Search for: "People v Word"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 17,907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
And, you know, I want that for all of our customers and for myself when I buy from Amazon, so I hope people believe that. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:01 am
The full court opinion: State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
None of the other false allegations were designed to get back at people. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:54 pm
Whenever a prosecutor reads the words "harmless error" his natural inclination is to say, "This means I can do it? [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He argues that Clinton v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 12:05 pm
On Aug. 26, the Israeli Supreme Court, in the case of Tziam v. the Prime Minister, ordered the state to grant the petitioners, five Palestinian women living in Gaza who required life-saving medical treatment, permission to enter East Jerusalem for the purpose of receiving healthcare. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
It's funny how some of the most staunch anti-gay (and yep, I'm not mincing words) folks I know tend to soften when they actually hear true stories about people who are truly impacted by the biases. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
That happened in North Carolina, where the state’s cyberbullying law was considered in State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Comment This judgment reaffirms the domestic courts’ acceptance of suspicionless stop and search powers but it is unlikely to be the final word on section 60’s compatibility with article 8. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 6:34 am
To many people, that’s the kind of word-twisting that makes people hate lawyers. * Not the First Time a CC Licensor Got Surprised. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:26 am
Vazquez, they simply forgot (or weren't told by their attorneys or people in HR) that she technically had to re-sign this agreement for it to be effective. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:22 pm
But let's just read the words. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 1:41 pm
In other words, if you go home early to catch your kid's soccer game, and so only work 7.5 hours, can they force you to take .5 hours as a "vacation"? [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:57 am
John Marshall Harlan’s dissent in Plessy V. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:07 am
” (0) When people search for “judge” (1) When judges sue (0) When a judge sues for defamation, cont’d (0) [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:30 am
No one appreciates how poorly words suffice to communicate a clear idea than those of us who are constrained to bet other people’s lives on them. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Spy Phone Labs LLC. v. [read post]
