Search for: "People v. Battle" Results 2321 - 2340 of 3,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Military detention may be legitimate for those captured on an actual battlefield, as our supreme court recognised in Hamdi v Rumsfeld. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
She later testified that white people were “becoming the minority” in Canada and that Indian people were “forcing their beliefs and their culture on the white people” [DaSilva hearing]. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am by Thomas Key
First, allowing 50 Cent's claim to proceed would have a substantial chilling effect on the exploitation of copyrighted works containing depictions of or appearances by real people. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am by Levin Papantonio
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
This was likely in the late ’80s when the tort reform battles were raging in Congress. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
Joseph Votel (January 29, 2024) The Just Security Podcast: ICJ Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
It appears that at least 32.5% of people will proclaim “TEFAL! [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:49 pm by admin
” As a result, he was sentenced to six month in prison (see: R. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 4:56 am by Andres
We are doomed to fight last decade’s battles again This has been a bad week for logic and reason. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:59 am
  While there are still those who believe that the law may and ought to prohibit people from having same-sex sexual relationships, much of the current debate -- particularly after the decision in Lawrence v. [read post]