Search for: "Peters v. Peters"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 7,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 4:10 am
Empirical Evidence from the Federal Courts, (Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming).Adam McDuffie, The Problem with the Peace Cross: American Legion v American Humanist Association and the Power of Courts to Shape Societal Memory, (Religio et Lex 4:1 (Summer 2021): 5-18).Sahar F. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:22 am
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: GREGORY MATTHEWS v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:00 am
BARNEY, TRUSTEE v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 9:30 pm
" (Senate Progressives v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
SANCHEZ v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:56 am
DBA Comptime Digital Printing v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
McCALLIE v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:12 am
Case Name: MICHAEL LEE COOPER v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:30 am
Rhoads 5th Senate District :Would provided for retroactive Tier V membership in the NY State and Local Employees' Retirement System to Daniel Miller S6343 by Andrew Gounardes 26th Senate District : Relates to the limitation of overtime compensation in final average salary calculations S6477 by Robert Jackson 31st Senate District : Provides home addresses of certain employees to employee organizations S6482A by John W. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 11:06 am
For a full discussion of why the tort has not developed in Australia, , I refer to David Rolph, ‘Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats (2001)’ in Paul Wragg and Peter Coe (eds), Landmark Cases in Privacy Law (Hart, 2023), 131. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:53 am
Rather, it must be an effect of such substance or quality that the method considered as a whole is proper subject matter for a patent.Cross references in Bazpat: http://bazpat.blogspot.com/search/label/Subject%20MatterSignificant cases cited: Grant v Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCAFCWelcome Real-Time SA v Catuity Inc [2001] FCA 445National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67 (The NRDC case)Commissioner of… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
” Peters v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:44 am
Fresh on the heels of yesterday's expose, our own Bob V tipped me to this debacle:"Surgeons say patients in some parts of England have spent months waiting in pain because of delayed operations or new restrictions on who qualifies for treatment. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:00 pm
What does the badly injured Peter get from the 25K? [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
*******Citizen Coverage**********(NOTE:This space is reserved for citizen coverage of the Virgin v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:47 pm
" Although the standard of review of a trial courts factfinding is one of deference, Cesare v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:03 pm
Peter Frampton v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:59 am
<> Dan Fette v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:38 am
In Whalen v. [read post]
