Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 2321 - 2340 of 5,844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Ransomware attacks have grown almost exponentially for several reasons: The ransomware business model works, with the FBI stating that ransomware is on pace to become a one billion dollar source of income for cybercriminals in 2017;  Ransomware start-up costs are cheap. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
The cases examined raise a broad range of important issues across the law of tort, including such diverse areas as acts of state and public nuisance, as well as central questions relating to the tort of negligence. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:34 am by Andrew Delaney
Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Co., 2017 VT 61By Andrew DelaneyWhen I was younger, I was quite good at math. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
For the second time, the Supreme Court has summarily reversed a state high court ruling that upheld such a maneuver, this time in a case involving Arkansas’s refusal to place the name of a mother’s wife on a child’s birth certificate.Post-Obergefell ManeuveringOne set of post-Obergefell developments relate to weddings themselves, and the refusal by some vendors—bakeries, florists, photographers, and so on—to provide services for same-sex weddings… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am by Barry Sookman
Norwich supplies a principled rationale for granting injunctions against non-parties who facilitate wrongdoing (see Cartier, at paras. 51-55; and Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Paul Alan Levy of Public Citizen — who took the lead in blowing open the (separate) Richart Ruddie/Profile Defenders deindexing fraud story — has just gone to court to set aside the order in one such case, Welter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Thus, it is essential when making a generic trade mark claim to clearly identify the goods and services related to the product: in fact, a mark maintains its validity if the public can describe “who” the mark is, conversely, the mark loses its validity if the public only understands “what” the service is Kellog Co. v. [read post]