Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES" Results 2321 - 2340 of 3,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:48 pm by David Bernstein
Previously, attention had focused mainly on a few major state court cases, along with Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm by Big Tent Democrat
As Scott Lemieux states, "[u]nder current practices, the AUMF George W. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:12 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Specifically, the bill states that “[i]f the Secretary requires sponsors seeking a [PRV] to demonstrate a good faith intent to market the rare pediatric disease product in the United States, the Secretary shall first issue a guidance document setting forth the required evidentiary support necessary to demonstrate such a good faith intent. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am by INFORRM
More significantly, the qualified privilege set out in Part 2 currently only applies to publications arising in UK and EU member states. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
State-imposed racial segregation was upheld in Plessy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:14 pm
These cases, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
SCOTT KAVALEK, et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 08-2646-NLH, United States District Court, D. [read post]