Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS" Results 2321 - 2340 of 5,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2016, 12:54 pm
The lawsuit lists the following claims for relief: • Count I - Breach of Contract against Bennington• Count II - Unjust Enrichment against all Defendants• Count III - Copyright Infringement against all Defendants• Count IV - Unfair Competition against all Defendants• Count V - Inducing Copyright Infringement against Bennington • Count VI - Violations of DMCA, 17 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Maybe the parties will be more inclined to settle on the eve of trial, or even after the trial if the decision is appealed – as was the case in the Apple v. [read post]
The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) recently agreed to hear the case South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  For the reasons why other courts disagree, we recommend reading Alm v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:57 am
No one would argue that the city could not demand that sellers of cars to the city's own police department meet higher standards of fuel efficiency than those specified by EPCA. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:52 am by David Klein
A company has an established business relationship with a consumer if: (a) the consumer has entered into a transaction with the seller within the previous 18 months, or (b) the consumer inquired about the seller’s goods/services within the previous three months. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:31 am by Hyland Hunt
The most significant case is Advanced Energy United, Inc. v. [read post]