Search for: "STATE v. SCOTT"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 6,290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
Scott Bomboy is editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 5:59 am
We're particularly partial to the entry that's been dubbed "State of Peepington v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:59 pm
The Court’s opinion in Scott v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
(citing United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 12:06 pm
Mary’s County erred in dismissing the multiple counts of burglary, assault, and malicious destruction of property, with which Gary Scott Flint, appellee, was charged, on the grounds that his ... [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 7:29 pm
Board of Education from the horror of Dred Scott or Plessy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:03 am
A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a “constitutional actor,” even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a “constitutional actor,” even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Hopkins and Oncale v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
In McLane v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
In the first, Scott v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Scott v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
This Article also explores our understanding of the Constitution and its relationship to slavery through the lens of Frederick Douglass.First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a “constitutional actor,” even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Petralia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
Andrew Maury and Scott Benjamin Cohen preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:48 am
In Galarza v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am
In the same year, you made it onto the board of the state defender association. [read post]
