Search for: "Samples v. Samples"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 5,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court released its widely-anticipated decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 2:37 pm
Riley Today, less than three weeks after oral argument, the Sixth Circuit affirmed a lower court order granting summary judgment in favor of Kaplan in one of the EEOC’s most high profile cases – - EEOC v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:59 am
Last week, in the wake of the State Supreme Court's ruling in Brayton et al. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
In Mobley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 4:32 am
Representativeness is often "more strongly influenced by the quality of the sample than by its size. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:29 am
FlaxManaging Director, Litigation ConsultingA2L Consulting Edit: see post-verdict follow-up article here.In the Apple v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
Gatlin v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:06 am
Shire City Herbals, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
Random date-stratified sample of 1200 albums released b/t 2008 and 2017, proportional to genres, w/physical and digital album sales/streaming. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
Title: Smith v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
Trials A – D are technical trials about the validity and/or essentiality of certain patents (the Judge in Trial E observed that the sample in these technical trials was too small to allow him to draw any conclusion as to the quality of Optis’ Portfolio; also, that the decisions of very experienced first instance judges varied on appeal, showing that the outcomes of questions of essentiality and validity are nuanced and extremely difficult to predict: [188]). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:50 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
” (R. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm
FRIENDS OF BLACKWATER v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
Furthermore, in exchange for clicking “I ACCEPT,” customers received the health and ancestry results from their DNA samples. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
Sierra Recycling & Demolition, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:35 am
The much-anticipated California Supreme Court’s decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
