Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 10:02 pm
It’s hard to believe that a case can get more intense than when a billion dollar verdict is awarded (later reduced to a measly $599 million), but the Apple v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
The takeaway, for me at least, is that we must consider each of these proposed reforms from a rules v. standards perspective. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
Alvarez, and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice articulated this constitutional right in the clearest voice yet, when they intervened in Sharp v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:02 am
A few days before the Apple v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
By now you've probably heard the story of David Eckert. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
In Rodriques v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
The constitution of this Court excited Merpel who, being a female Kat, is also something of a feminist: sitting with the sole male judge (the Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Terence Etherton) were two Ladies Justices of Appeal, Lady Justice Hallett and Lady Justice Sharp. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Aitsebaomo, Challenges to Federal Income Tax Exemption of the Clergy and Government Support of Sectarian Schools Through Tax Credits Device and the Unresolved Questions after Arizona v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
Here, the appeals court majority determined that the district court erred when it ignored the “sharp dispute” in the evidence as to the health effects of chemical exposure at the foundry and the impact, if any, that showering and changing clothes would have on the workers. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:05 pm
Tamar Lewin of the New York Times discusses the sharp increase in iPad and iPhone use by youngsters. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am
The Australian court is concerned because it's currently holding an extensive Samsung v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
In Consolidated Fastfrate Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 12:52 pm
The question in Robers v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:50 am
Today at 1:30 PM Pacific Time the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold an Apple v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:59 pm
The lead case being reviewed is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
United States, Debs v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:34 am
This is a sharp departure from well-established legal rules concerning causation. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:54 am
Moreover, not even Samsung argues that any of the highly confidential Apple-Ericsson, Apple-Sharp, or Apple-Philips information--that was widely disseminated to Samsung employees--was ever publicly known." [read post]
