Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 2321 - 2340 of 3,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am by Eliana Baer
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am by Eliana Baer
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of Law Professors Amicus brief of New Jersey Public Advocate Amicus brief of the United States (grant) Supplemental brief of respondents Title: Ortho Biotech Products v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:57 am
Last week, both houses of the New Jersey state legislature passed a bill to abolish the state's death penalty, a measure the governor has promised to sign. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Frank TamayoCase Number: 14-cv-05844 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case Filed: September 19, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 14, 2015 8/31/2015 11/29/2015 2015-77 SEC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:31 am by Jeremy Tyler
The court agreed: It is well established that the United States and its agencies are immune from suit unless Congress explicitly waives sovereign immunity. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 12:17 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
  Further, the very marriage contracts upon which the “new model” is based would themselves appear to be unlawful and contrary to the public policy of this state – their object being the divorce of married people and the termination of a familial relationship at the end of a fixed term unless the contract was renewed – as evidenced by the decisions of our New Jersey Supreme Court in Staedler v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
John operating in the United States, at least three United States groups and a Cuban association share the nonexclusive license to use Plaintiff’s name. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
Just in May 2011, Sun Life was hit with two complaints from disability insurance benefits claimants, one in the United States District Court District of New Jersey (Kevin Giblin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm by Stephen Wermiel
Murphy, a challenge to New Jersey attendance limits brought by a church and a synagogue, the court followed the same course. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of VirginiaOpinion Date: 5/17/12Cite: Capital One Fin. [read post]