Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 2321 - 2340 of 8,247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am by Jeremy Malcolm
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am by Jeremy Malcolm
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 12:24 pm by Jason Rantanen
Ultimately, the patent holder is attempting to regulate activity outside of the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:28 am by Ben
Just a little bit more pressure and all would be under control.Then, when the landmark MGM Studios v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Liz Kramer
  And in both, the credit card holder later sued for problems with the collection efforts. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am by Laura Jehl and Stephanie Malaska
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:03 am
The Court also stated that features that have been modified by FN Herstal to provide them with additional technical functions cannot be considered “copied” either, and in any event not “slavishly”. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:03 am by Peter Mahler
Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], involving the same Delaware LLC at issue in the Estate of Calderwood case (#6 above), in which the trial court held that the holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, nonetheless identified in the operating agreement as a “Management Member,” was entitled to inspect the LLC’s books and records. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
This was stated in Best Buy v Worldwide Sales Corporation [2000]FSR 686, in which Floyd J expressed concern about “exporting” the threats provisions overseas. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]