Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 4,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Ms Lohan sued Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. and Rockstar Games, the makers of the video game Grand Theft Auto V (GTAV). [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:16 am
Readers of this blog may remember that last July Lindsay Lohan sued Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. and Rockstar Games, the makers of the video game Grand Theft Auto V (GTAV). [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:41 am
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
In a seminal case in North Carolina, Hinkamp v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:52 am
The relevant inquiry is whether the company in question was “the decision-maker responsible for the employment practice giving rise to the litigation. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
The Ninth Circuit Sure Doesn’t Know–Nguyen v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:45 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:57 pm
Files: kidaneopposition.pdfRelated Issues: AnonymityInternationalPrivacyRelated Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
The supposed targets of the coercion, the decision-makers in the states, thought so, too. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:55 am
Consider the decision makers. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Cambridge v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
A federal district court in Michigan accordingly granted summary judgment to the employer (Dillon v Norfolk Southern Railway Co, July 31, 2014, Rosen, G). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
In the case, Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
If an insurer that a decision maker believes should be participating has a solid coverage defense it should be factored in immediately. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
The Fashionista blog predicts that this is unlikely to be the end of the story, with a further appeal here and/or further proceedings in the United States unless the parties can use yesterday’s judgment to form the basis of a coexistence agreement. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
They’re just not an antitrust violation in the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 6:34 am
As to the employee’s termination, however, she presented no evidence of age discrimination, and it looked like relations between the employee and her department head had soured in the months leading up to her dismissal (Mullinix v Mount Sinai School of Medicine, July 24, 2014, Castel, K). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 11:32 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
