Search for: "State v. Ore"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 2,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2012, 3:43 am
We think this is the first one and as Upper Tribunal decisions are binding on the RPT it is likely to be important.Parker v Waller & Ors [2012] UKUT 301 (LC) is an appeal against a Southern RPT decision to award 100% of the rent for the 12 months preceding an application by the tenants, some £15,423.63.The facts are fairly simple. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
Q: Where do I get a copy of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Amount of Shares -- The amount of shares offered can be stated as an exact number or as a percentage of the outstanding shares. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
SMALL TALK vs BIG TALK (The IP Factor) Serbia Serbia joins Hague Agreement on International Designs (Class 99) South Africa Bad faith and bona fide intentions (Afro-IP) Switzerland No sweet success for Wander against Dr Oetker in trade dress dispute over caramel puddings (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Committal for contempt not fit for ‘grey area’ disputes: Grisbrook v MGN Ltd & Ors (IPKat) (PatLit) EWCA:… [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:31 am
Union of India & Ors., (2015) 5 SCC 1. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:05 pm
Here is the entirety of the Court's analysis on the point: The EEOC and Perich also contend that our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
” At the Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Douglas Berman considers Monday’s decision in Dean v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
” At In These Times, James Gray Pope and others look at approaches to “rebuilding labor after the Supreme Court’s … ruling” in Janus v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:11 am
Here is the entirety of the Court's analysis on the point: The EEOC and Perich also contend that our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
This Court in the case of Deputy Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Secretary Carson stated that the regulation was “unworkable and ultimately a waste of time for localities. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
On Thursday, in Samrai & Ors v Kalia [2022] EWHC 1424 (QB), Deputy Master Grimshaw handed down his decision in an application to strike out a claim by members of an unnamed Hindu religious organisation against their religious leader. [read post]
