Search for: "State v. Taylor " Results 2321 - 2340 of 3,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Taylor, 4845, 3464/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 9893; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
Authors: Liz Hastilow, Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Steven Li, Liam Mackay and Mia Blundell. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
 But in the field of artistic works and copyright infringement, the effects of papercuts run deeper, as is apparent in the recent decision of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales in Taylor v Maguire, in a case for copyright infringement in works produced by the method of papercutting. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In analyzing whether the plaintiff is entitled to the information it seeks, the starting point of inquiry is CPL 720.35(2) which provides: Except where specifically required or permitted by statute or upon specific authorization of the court, all official records and papers, whether on file with the court, a police agency or the division of criminal justice services, relating to a case involving a youth who has been adjudicated a youthful offender, are confidential and may not be made available to… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:57 am
[Contract provisions agreed upon in the course of collective negotiations pursuant to the Taylor Law cannot not override a statutory mandate.] [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
Taylor then turned the drive over to the Office of the Attorney General (OAG), and an investigation commenced. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:19 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is illustrated in a 5th Circuit Court of Appeals case styled, Ellis v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
" The law could be upheld only if the state could show it served a significant local interest that could not be furthered by a non-discriminatory law--this Oklahoma could not show.Maine v Taylor (1986) is a rare example of a Supeme Court decision upholding a state statute that discriminated against out-of-state commerce. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:15 am by Eric Quitugua
” Outside of Baylor, he is a Texas Bar Foundation fellow, a member of the State Bar of Texas Local Bar Services Committee, a barrister in the Judge Abner V. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
This fall term, the United States Supreme Court will hear Kirtsaeng v. [read post]