Search for: "State v. Wise" Results 2321 - 2340 of 2,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 8:40 am by Marty Lederman
  Until you are removed from the United States, you will remain detained under Title 40, Unite[d] States Code, Section 21. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:03 pm
  The opinion is Alabama State Bar v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
As in the United States, pre-merger integration, coordination and/or information sharing is an important antitrust issue under Canada's Competition Act. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
Two notable gems are Maqbool Fida Hussain v Raj Kumar Pandey, 2008 (6) Del. 533 (decrying misuse of obcenity prosecutions) Ju [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm by Charon QC
The claimant, who is wisely remaining anonymous, said that he was an amateur body builder, and “my body grew and I wanted the rest to follow“. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
  Whether or not it would have been wise, there seems little doubt that the President constitutionally could have pardoned Arpaio had he been convicted of one of these federal crimes. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm by Larry Downes
  The Commission (for now) has wisely avoided taking that step, which itself would have been subject to substantial legal challenges. [read post]