Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 2321 - 2340 of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2014, 3:17 am
Henleys passed the watches to its subsidiary at cost price, and any profits made by the sale of the watches which had been supplied to Henleys Retail were made by it. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:40 am by Afro-Buff
SNAPCHAT has argued that the type of invention relied on is not eligible for patent protection, in terms of the case of Alice v CLS Bank International (a 2014 US Supreme Court decision). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm by Stephen Griffin
  If someone wants to argue later that we don’t need Article V, so much the better! [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 12:00 am by Chijioke Okorie
  Readers may also recall that in the wake of the HIV epidemic, South Africa’s Competition Commission in Hazel Tau and others v GlaxoSmithKline South Africa and Boehringer Ingelheim accepted the argument that the respondents’ activities in relation to the drugs for treatment of HIV constituted an abuse of dominance in the form of excessive pricing and other exclusionary conduct. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am by Neil Wilkof
Among other things, the District Court considered that the accused had failed to exercise prudence in selecting the supplier of these goods, as well as the low pricing and dubious packaging of the goods in question. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:42 am by admin
Is this a price we’re willing to pay? [read post]