Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 2321 - 2340 of 9,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
At the time of his accident, the Staten Island plaintiff was not utilizing an available order selector provided for use in retrieving furniture at higher levels. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
At the time of his accident, the Staten Island plaintiff was not utilizing an available order selector provided for use in retrieving furniture at higher levels. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:21 pm
It is clear that the Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
But the courtroom debates in the US, Germany, UK and China have raised numerous unanswered questions about what this means. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 7:46 am by Alexander A. Reinert
I omitted 2009 so that I could better evaluate whether the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Pearson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
  Although the Judge refused permission to appeal, it was granted on paper by Kitchin LJ on 7 August 2015 and the appeal was expedited and is being heard after less than two and half months. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:14 am by Dave Ratner
Provisions of the federal system that have no parallel at the state level include:Ability to use the registered trademark symbol (®) when the mark is used for the goods and services listed in the registration (although the trademark superscript (™) remains available for all uses, including common law) Incontestability after five years of continuous useA basis for foreign registrationsUse of U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 11:16 am by Rantanen
  The court subsequently granted partial summary judgment on Allflex's inequitable conduct claim, holding that Avid's failure to disclose information about prior public use and an offer of sale was material. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:30 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
At the lower court level, the parties agreed that the children’s quality and style of life are equally provided by both parents. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:04 am by admin
Supreme Court granted certiori in the case of Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]