Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 2321 - 2340 of 10,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
As the doctrine has played out, religious freedom has little to do with it. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
Here is an early result of the pernicious decision in Herring v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Gillian E. Metzger
The legitimacy of presidential constitutionalism is frequently debated, most recently in the context of President Obama’s refusal to defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
I was gambling in Havana; I took a little risk: Pernod Ricard USA LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am by MBettman
At issue are these three certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division: What is the statute of limitations for claims of negligent misidentification? [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:58 pm by Jon Ibanez
In 2013, the United State Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:21 am by David A. Moss
June 2011 marks the 40th anniversary of President Richard Nixon's declaration of a "war on drugs" — a war that has cost roughly a trillion dollars, has produced little to no effect on the supply of or demand for drugs in the United States, and has contributed to making America the world's largest incarcerator. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
That year the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:11 pm
The letter does not preclude the United States from investigating FMC based on new facts. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
See also Markell, Amicus Curiae Brief in Favor of Respondent, Bank of America v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, No. 97-1498, United States Supreme Court, October Term 1997 (filed August 17, 1998).But I'm still in search of another source: I could swear that somewhere in the work of Mr. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore his blog had only a minor impact, as it drew seemingly very little public attention, and the comments remained only one month online. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:11 pm
Congress could have expressly limited the Rule's application to specific acts, but it did not do so.On part two Judge Baker found error, but ultimately held no prejudice under the constitutional standard (harmless beyond a reasonable doubt), citing United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
Professor Ely notes that, since World War II, few property disputes have sparked widespread public interest and debate like the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]