Search for: "V D" Results 2321 - 2340 of 76,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 3:55 am by traceydennis
Telefónica Móviles España SA v Administración del Estado, Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones (Case C-85/10);  [2011] WLR (D)  102 “National legislation that provided for a fee to be levied on operators of telecommunications services holding individual licences for the use of radio frequencies, but which did not allocate a specific use to the income derived from that fee, and which significantly increased the… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:24 am by Patrick M. McDermott
In a recent Client Alert, Hunton insurance lawyers Mike Levine, Sergio Oehninger and Josh Paster discuss the impact of the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in Patriarch Partners, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Kelly (Nooksack Tribal Ct.): Adams v Kelly Motion for TRO Adams v Kelly Defendants’ Opposition to to Plaintiffs’ Motion for TRO and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Adams v Kelly Declaration of Rick D. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Kelly (Nooksack Tribal Ct.): Adams v Kelly Motion for TRO Adams v Kelly Defendants’ Opposition to to Plaintiffs’ Motion for TRO and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Adams v Kelly Declaration of Rick D. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:52 pm by Steve Hall
  The SCOTUSblog case file in Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:48 am by tracey
Regina v Qureshi [2011] WLR (D)  161 “A landlord of a residential occupier could not be convicted of an offence of harassment, contrary to section 1(3A) of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977, on the basis of vicarious liability. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:23 pm by Jane Chong
Circuit has just issued a per curiam order denying six Guantanamo detainees’ petition for rehearing en banc in Allaithi v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 12:22 am by GenericIPguy
FICCI is organising a round table discussion on section 3(d) of the Patents Act on 29/Mar at New Delhi.D G Shah + Senior representatives from three important ministries will put forth thier views.1) Controller General Shri Kurian [Patent Office];2) Shri Arun Jha from the Dept. of Pharmaceuticals [Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers] and3) Shri V. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:51 am by JT
Tyson v Nazarian, 2012 NY Slip Op 04459 (4th Dept. 2012) I think a case like this probably explains on some level the 1% rule in no-fault verses the “exacerbation” rule in the 5102(d) context. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:17 am by Ayman Idlbi
La relation entre les brevets et l’innovation des véhicules aériens pilotés à distance remonte déjà à plus de 150 ans. [read post]