Search for: "Wills v. State"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 11,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
See, Holk v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
" The Appellate Division held that a default is not willful when it arises from financial disability or from "a sincere, though mistaken, belief that payments were not required, especially when that belief was based upon advice from counsel" (Parnes v Parnes, 41 AD3d 934, 937 [2007]; see Desautels v Desautels, 80 AD3d 926, 930 [2011]; see also Allen v Allen, 83 AD2d 708, 709 [1981]). [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Ermini v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:52 am
”The court then indicated that GOL §11-106 provides that "[i]n addition to any other right of action or recovery otherwise available under law, whenever any . . . firefighter suffers any injury, disease or death while in the lawful discharge of his official duties and that injury, disease or death is proximately caused by the neglect, willful omission, or intentional, willful or culpable conduct of any person or entity, other than that . . . firefighter's… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:55 pm
Last month in Williams v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
Commonwealth, 304 S.W.3d 15, 41-42 (Ky. 2009), citing State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
A majority of the Court is willing to allow some kind of review of consular officer visa decisions. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
Because he had lots of ties to the US, and might have been willing to roll the dice.But maybe not. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 5:02 pm
It's just that Judge Christen continues to use the word "animus" in her description of the underlying mental state, and that word is typically used to describe a particular mental state that doesn't always exist in her chosen definition.)I'll go even further. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:41 am
Rooney v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:13 am
As observed in Jack v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
At PrawfsBlog, Howard Wasserman also explores possible congressional or state actions that could simultaneously allow willing shareholders to opt in to election-related activities while limiting the broader role of corporate expenditures. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am
Wade, decided in 1973, was a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
The logic of the proposed FTC-Google deal is that injunctive relief must be denied against "willing licensees". [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm
No one knows what the Supreme Court will do in Turner v. [read post]
SJC to Consider Whether Defendant’s Should Have Right to Consult with Attorney Prior to Breathalyzer
30 May 2016, 9:27 am
According to an article in the Berkshire Eagle, the Supreme Judicial Court is scheduled to hear argument in a Berkshire OUI case – Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 7:42 pm
Id. at 9 (comment: of course, knowledge (or at least willful blindness) that the acts infringe is also required under Global-Tech v. [read post]
