Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells" Results 2341 - 2360 of 4,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In relief, the plaintiffs sought only statutory damages (as well as attorney's fees and costs) on behalf of themselves and the class as a result of the statutory violation. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am by Florian Mueller
After Professor Sikorski's presentation, I filled in for Kent Baker of u-blox, who wasn't able to travel that week, to give a quick overview of the Continental v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A few months ago, we wrote about precisely such a case, Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Sept. 4, 2018], in which Commercial Division Justice Lawrence S. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:45 am by Eric Goldman
Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s order dismissing count XIV. * Rector v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Janene Marasciullo
 Form CRS also requires the BD to state that it has “a legal or disciplinary history” if either the BD or any of its RRs has made disclosures concerning criminal proceedings, regulatory proceedings, judicial proceedings, or unsatisfied judgments on their Forms BD, U-4 or U-5, or if an RR has reported a customer complaint or a specified termination on a Form U-4 or Form U-5. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 4:30 am
Recently, Judge Cleland from the U S District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan held in Phinn v Capital One Auto Finance, that a firm offer of credit does not have to include terms of repayment including an interest rate. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 4:30 am
Recently, Judge Cleland from the U S District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan held in Phinn v Capital One Auto Finance, that a firm offer of credit does not have to include terms of repayment including an interest rate. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
The driver then consented to a search of the taxi `as well as his property and person. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
  In other words, “the plaintiff must allege that a well-recognized duty owed under state law was breached by a manufacturer’s conduct that violates the FDCA. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
That much, at least, is well established, not only in Plaut but also in many other cases. [read post]