Search for: "47 DEFENDANTS" Results 2341 - 2360 of 4,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Under California law, Civil Code Section 47(c) "extends a conditional privilege against defamation to communications made without malice on subjects of mutual interest. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:11 am
.: Saugus police put out a broadcast transmission report of the erratic driver, possibly headed toward Route 1. 1:47 a.m. and 38 seconds: Driver calls state police to report the car crash that claimed Cashin's life. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:07 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Jeffries Employer Not Liable for Employee’s Threatening Emails Per 47 USC 230–Delfino v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:13 pm by Shea Denning
Williams, 308 N.C. 47, 67, (1983), so long as both “occur in a time frame that can be perceived as a single transaction. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
This was approved by HHJ Lewis in Stadler v Currys Group Limited [2022] EWHC 160 (QB) (31 January 2022) [47]-[59] (noted on Out-Law) and by Nicklin J in Underwood v Bounty UK Ltd [2022] EWHC 888 (QB) (13 April 2022) [52] (noted on Panopticon). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Defendant’s 0.17 alcohol concentration did not render him a danger. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am by Ashley Gorski
The problem is that this administrative procedure likely fails to satisfy Article 47 of the CFR. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
In re D.G., 187 Cal.App.4th 47, 52, 113 Cal. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Op. at 38 (“Pennsylvania courts permit[] defendants to adduce evidence of compliance with governmental regulation in their efforts to demonstrate due care”). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
He would like to have access to the full record in this case so that both he and members of the public may better understand (1) the plaintiff's allegations that the defendant had libeled him, (2) the basis for the plaintiff's apparent request for the extraordinary remedy of "order[ing the Defendant] to refrain from any further statements about the Plaintiff," (3) the defendant's arguments for why he should prevail, which appear to be set forth in… [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:55 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since the record is silent as to the length of this post-readiness adjournment sought by the People, the People are charged with the 47 day period from July 15, 2011 to August 31, 2011. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am by Eric
* Robert Sprague and Mary Ellen Wells, Regulating Online Buzz Marketing: Untangling a Web of Deceit, 47 American Business Law Journal 415 (2010). [read post]