Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 2341 - 2360 of 95,148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2006, 5:51 am
Aug. 4, 2006) (unpublished), the parties were all members of an extended family, and plaintiffs sued to recover certain properties in the estate of Frederick Carrozza Jr. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:03 am by buslawblogger
Every once in a while I teach a case where the students find it somewhat odd that the plaintiff would incur all the expense of going to trial given what's at stake for the particular plaintiff. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:46 pm by Allan Blutstein
.) -- dismissing plaintiff’s lawsuit after finding that plaintiff failed to administratively appeal FBI’s final determinations on his three requests.Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:52 pm by The Settlement Channel
Because tax advice to plaintiffs in lawsuits is often left until the settlement is concluded, many plaintiffs’attorneys direct that all monies are paid to them to obviate withholding and Forms 1099. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:05 pm
There was an auto accident in Dallas; plaintiffs sued Volkswagen in Marshall, Texas, in the notoriously plaintiff-friendly Eastern District of Texas, which has a hugely abnormal number of product liability cases--17% of all federal automobile product liability lawsuits in the... [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:36 pm by Allan Blutstein
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:01 am by Allan Blutstein
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:07 am by Legal Profession Prof
(plaintiff or Merck) is entitled to insurance coverage under the "all risks"... [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 3:19 pm
Here's a link to the free pdf file. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cbjtsc05.pdf Highlights: 1) In 2005 plaintiffs won in more than half (56%) of all general civil trials concluded in state courts. 2) Interestingly, plaintiffs were significantly... [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The question of how plaintiff lost it all never comes up for review. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 6:02 am
There was, however, a consent to search form involved that plaintiffs signed, and all this adds up to qualified immunity. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:14 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
BRK Brands, the plaintiffs’ allegations were all based on various product liability themes, but since the plaintiffs failed to present the necessary evidence at trial and on appeal, the case was lost. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"Given the highly unusual facts of this case, the district court would be well within its discretion to conclude that this is a rare instance where a plaintiff who 'formally prevails under Section 1988 should receive no attorneys' fees at all.'" [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:24 am by Kevin
She answered them all correctly for me, but maybe she just likes me better. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am by Cameron Kerry, John B Morris, Jr.
These serve to vindicate privacy interests by ensuring a recovery for a prevailing plaintiff regardless of the actual damages. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 1:24 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
F.S. 766.102(1) places the burden of proof in these cases on the plaintiff (person injured) to show the health care provider breached the prevailing professional standard of care, given the care provider’s care, skill and treatment in light of all relevant surrounding circumstances. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:17 pm by Russell Jackson
  The article focuses on the recent decision in the Toyota Unintended Acceleration MDL denying the plaintiffs' motion to apply California law (the law of one defendant's residence) to all of the plaintiffs' claims. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:48 am by Patricia Salkin
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City on all nine claims The gravamen of plaintiff’s due process and equal protection claims was that the City owed the Trust a duty to provide notice and an opportunity to respond before downzoning the lot in question and to refrain from singling out the Trust’s property for disparate and discriminatory treatment. [read post]