Search for: "Crawford " Results 2341 - 2360 of 6,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm by Jon Sands
The general nature of the testimony rather than explicit detail (regarding the investigation and an alibi defense) did not excuse the Crawford violation. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:09 am
Today the Supreme Court hears argument on a significant Confrontation Clause case that will further illuminate the boundaries of what constitutes a "testimonial" statement under Crawford v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:58 am by Russ Bensing
Okay, so I don’t like the 8th District’s work on hearsay and Crawford. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:49 am
  When he returns to Crawford in another 40 days, he’s going to find the state far different, at least in that dubious context. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 5:42 am by Jessica Smith
Hiding in plain sight in that case is an issue as interesting as the Crawford question that the Court will decide. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
  For those late to the party, the Supreme Court held in Crager that testimony by a DNA analyst who wasn’t the one who actually performed the test didn’t violate the defendant’s confrontation rights, because scientific tests weren’t testimonial  under Crawford v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 7:17 am by John Floyd
The recent video that captured three Crawford County, Arkansas, police officers restraining and beating a man illustrates the social value of video recording the police in public. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 12:12 am
There is a strikingly odd passage in Jan Crawford Greenberg's new book on the Supreme Court, Supreme Conflict. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:04 am
A Public Option for Bank Accounts (or Central Banking for All) Posted by Morgan Ricks (Vanderbilt University), John Crawford (University of California), and Lev Menand, on Friday, June 22, 2018 Tags: Banks, Capital markets, Central banking, Federal Reserve, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Public interest Gender Quotas on California Boards Posted by Ron Berenblat, Andrew Freedman, and Steve Wolosky, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP,… [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
I'm not making any predictions about what will happen in Columbus, Ohio, on November 18, but here's a prediction I will make: The Michigan Supreme Court will not soon issue a Crawford opinion as absurd as the one issued this week (over a nice dissent) by a 4-3 majority of the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:20 am by Paul Horwitz
At the Faculty Lounge, Bridget Crawford has a post about the hiring interview. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Tom Remington
The Court of Appeal decision in Crawford and another v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 provides guidance as to the procedural standards required in misconduct cases in which dismissal is likely to impact on the employee's ability to pursue his/her chosen career. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Tom Remington
The Court of Appeal decision in Crawford and another v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 provides guidance as to the procedural standards required in misconduct cases in which dismissal is likely to impact on the employee's ability to pursue his/her chosen career. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
  Reuters reports on the incident, quoting SCOTUSblog’s own Tom Goldstein, while at CBS News, Jan Crawford posits that Obama’s direct attack on the Court suggests that he might try to stretch the Citizens United debate into the confirmation process if Justice Stevens retires this year. [read post]
24 May 2017, 6:30 am by Senior Editor
  This Interview with Broadspire’s CEO Danielle Lisenbey was originally published in Crawford’s On the FrontLine Magazine – Spring 2017   The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) implemented a final rule in 2017 requiring employers that must record workplace injuries and illnesses for OSHA to submit reports of such incidents electronically. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
  One of them, Crawford v. [read post]