Search for: "Dennis Crouch"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 2,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2009, 7:15 pm
Dennis Crouch. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:51 pm
Patent and Trademark Office, http://www.uspto.gov/ Careers in Intellectual Property Law, ABA, http://www.abanet.org/intelprop/careers.htmlAppendix to Careers in Intellectual Property Law, ABA, http://www.abanet.org/intelprop/appendix.htmlIntellectual Property Today Magazine, http://www.iptoday.com/ Patently O blog (Dennis Crouch), http://www.patentlyo.com/IPWatchdog blog (Gene Quinn), http://ipwatchdog.com/ How to Become an Intellectual Property Paralegal,… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford)Thomas Field (New Hampshire)Ted Sichelman (UCSD)Peter Menell (Berkeley)Robert Merges (Berkeley)Lee Petherbridge (Loyola)Gregory Mandel (Temple)Dennis Crouch (Missouri)Scott Hemphill (Columbia)Dan Burk (Irvine)Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU)Jason Rantanen (Iowa)Jay Kesan (Illinois)Shamnad Basheer (West Bengal National University)James Bessen (Research on Innovation)Gideon Parchomovsky (Penn)Ralph Clifford (U Mass Dartmouth)Jonathan Masur (Chicago)Ronald Mann… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:30 am
Likely everyone in the industry is already familiar with folks like Professor Dennis Crouch of PatentlyO, who tweets @patentlyo, so I tried to focus (for the most part) on some lesser known tweeters. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:32 am
" Dennis Crouch's Comment: Patent filings are clearly down, but I don't know that I agree with the reporter's conclusion that therefore "U.S. innovation took a step backward for the first time in 13 years. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:51 am
A scatter plot showing a payment rate over time for each of the three maintenance fees payments required during the life of a patent is shown in an article by Dennis Crouch. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 7:41 pm
Dennis Crouch [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
by Dennis Crouch This may be a useful case for patent prosecutors to cite to the USPTO because it creates a strong dividing line for the printed matter doctrine — applying the doctrine only to cases where the claims recite the communicative content of information. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:27 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Virtek Vision International ULC v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
by Dennis Crouch In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit vacated a district court’s grant of summary judgment that an inventor, Dr. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patent law petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Vanda v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:00 am
by Dennis Crouch BOT M8 v. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
by Dennis Crouch In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit held that a claimed range reciting narrower values than those described in the patent specification can still satisfy the written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:11 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s 2023 decision in In re Cellect, LLC, 81 F.4th 1216 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 10:21 am
by Dennis Crouch Amyndas Pharm., S.A. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:21 am
by Dennis Crouch The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over any “appeal from a final decision of a district court of the United States . . . in any civil action arising under . . . any Act of Congress relating to patents. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
by Dennis Crouch Hologic, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:01 am
by Dennis Crouch Michael Kaufman v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 8:24 am
By Dennis Crouch Almost all patent law professionals will agree that an accused infringer with good prior art generally has a much better chance of getting the claims cancelled via IPR rather than asking a jury to decide. [read post]
