Search for: "Doe-Individuals 6-50"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
For this particular change anyway, the old adage of ‘the more things change, the more than stay the same’ does apply (to some degree at least). [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
This is in the law and is already in effect (as of 2011). 6. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
There are other circumstances set out in the PD in which disclosure is permitted by certain individuals to other individuals for specific purposes but none which are relevant to this case or which provide for the publication of information to the public at large. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:54 am
The Court's rationale for upholding the individual mandate was not that Congress can force individuals to buy health insurance (as the Court found that the mandate would actually violate the Commerce Clause), but rather that Congress, under its power to "lay and collect taxes," is permitted to impose a tax on individuals for failing to have insurance. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
Everyone, Roberts noted, will likely participate in many types of markets, including, for example, the one for food (such as broccoli), but that mere fact does not authorize Congress to direct them to purchase products in a given market today. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
It should be noted that this opinion does not allow an attorney to hide the identity witnesses. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
See, Bert Whitehead, There are Conflicts Inherent In Assets-under-management Pricing, Investment News (Nov. 27, 2011 6:01 am), http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
Denniston has covered the Supreme Court for more than 50 years. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am
The Court of Chancery previously has ”squarely” held that the adjudication of one stockholder’s individual claim does not have preclusive effect on a second stockholder’s ability to assert the claim. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
Does the company have to pay for her counsel? [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 does not define precisely what the silicone component is, but indicates that it is provided as a single blend, in the form of an aqueous emulsion, which is added to the composition during manufacture. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
It also states that each of them is “being sued herein in her individual capacity as well as her capacity as supervisory employee of Defendant CCSF. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
The sample included 128 heterosexuals (61 couples and 6 individuals) who were at least 18 years old, expecting their first child, and living together; both partners had to be willing to participate. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:21 pm
The Home Office is clear that “This does not mean that the Secretary of State and Parliament have the only say on what is proportionate. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Forest Service, 05-16801, 6/1/2012). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:54 am
Bulgarian law does not allow any appeal against a fine of 50 Bulgarian lev or below, defining it as an administrative penalty that is not admissible in the appellate system. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
But that does not mean they had an exemplary track record. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am
[Plaintiffs] presented no evidence that [the] prescribing physicians or [plaintiffs] would have acted differently had [defendant] provided a different warning that included [the information plaintiffs advocated].Slip op. at 49-50 (lots of citations omitted). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
Compromise Agreements will be renamed “Settlement Agreements” 6. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Other research has consistently found that longer commute times have been associated with shorter individual sleep times. [read post]
