Search for: "Does 1 - 64"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 2,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
S. 1, 11 (1931)), and approved a construction of the term "composition of matter" consistent with common usage, see Chakrabarty, supra, at 308 (citing Shell Development Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
Andy Ihnatko of the Chicago Sun Times discusses iOS 4, as does Roy Forchgott of the New York Times. iSmashPhone looks at the Best 64 Features of iOS 4. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:44 am
Although I initially described my reactions in a Dorf on Law post (here) shortly after the interview, my analysis on FindLaw focuses on two issues: (1) The incorrect subsequent framing of the controversy as a pointless rehash of a long-resolved policy debate from 1964, and (2) The disturbing underlying similarity (despite large apparent differences) between Paul's view of business regulation and President Obama's view. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
” Docket No. 64 at 15. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:14 pm
[Continued from yesterday's Part 1.] [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
Pursuant A 64(2) and in view of the fact that granted claim 1 does not comprise any feature defining this manufacturing process in detail (see [6.3.3] above) the protection conferred by this claim would cover any pharmaceutical preparation comprising any botulinum neurotoxin. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
§1325(b)(1); see also §1325(b)(1) (2000 ed.). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
301/06 Ireland v Parliament and Council [2009] ECR I-593, paragraph 64; United Kingdom v Parliament and Council, paragraphs 60 to 64). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Administrative Per Se Procedure and Standard of Appellate Review (1)We begin with a brief o [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
January 1, 2011 for calendar year plans). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
Heger Realty Corp. (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 698, 707; City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:16 am
Dietrich (1970), 1 C.C.C. (2d) 49 (Ont. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:57 am
We are not turning WestlawNext on for all accounts on June 1. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:00 am
" The scale is 5% on the first $20,000; 2.5% on the next $80,000; and 1% on the remainder. [read post]
22 May 2010, 11:00 am
Does the change of wording between R 64 EPC 1973 and R 99 EPC 2000 have an impact on how a notice of appeal and/or a statement of grounds of appeal has to be drafted? [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:08 am
And it is over 64% after the modification. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:21 pm
Why, then, does the 2010 National Drug Control Strategy released last week still allocate 64 percent of federal drug control dollars to "supply reduction" law enforcement strategies and only 36 percent to "demand reduction" strategies like treatment and prevention? [read post]
16 May 2010, 7:41 pm
So what does the report say about China? [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:53 pm
What does this mean? [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:19 pm
.), supplemented, 64 N.J. [read post]
