Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The NT2 case was the first “delisting order” made by an English court and was, perhaps understandably, the focus of most of the media reporting (for example, the BBC and the Guardian). [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 7:40 pm
Party Constitution CPPCC Constitution State Constitution 1945 Amendment VI 1949 Common Program 1954 Amendment I Constitution Promulgated 1956 Amendment VII 1969 Amendment VIII 1973 Amendment IX 1975 Amendment I 1977 Amendment X 1978 Amendment II Amendment II 1982 Amendment XI Amendment III Amendment III 1987 Amendment XII 1988 Amendment IV 1992 Amendment XIII 1993 Amendment V 1994 Amendment IV 1997 Amendment… [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
Oregon can never be one of the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
The court stated that as no “preclusionary rule” existed, it did not need to resolve the broader question of whether the law of contempt provided sufficient protection in cases of contempt. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 12:24 pm
(Equilon Enterprises v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
Scott Harman summarized the proceedings in Doe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
A similar issue was explored by the Supreme Court in R. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 3:42 am
Interestingly, in light of the Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Lilly having been handed down after the first instance judgment in the present proceedings, Regeneron appears to have argued that even if Kymab was right on construction, there was still infringement under the newly-conceived English law doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:02 pm
In A v B, the English court held that a single notice to arbitrate under several arbitration agreements was invalid and the arbitrator had no authority to decide disputes under several arbitration agreements. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
In A v B, the English court held that a single notice to arbitrate under several arbitration agreements was invalid and the arbitrator had no authority to decide disputes under several arbitration agreements. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
” He continued: “One can only contemplate with dread the answer the current Court would have given had it been asked to overrule Plessy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:19 pm
Martinez issued an 18-page order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in the Mendez Rojas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Cross-examination is a key feature of trials in the English Patents Court and one of which many English litigators are particularly proud. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy In Boumediene et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:54 am
Yesterday, the Court declared this application inadmissible as Art 4 of Protocol No 7, according to both its wording and the Court’s previous case law, ‘only concerned “courts in the same State”‘ (see the English Press Release). [35.] [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
However, he stated categorically that this is not compulsory when instructing experts, and accepted that it can be costly and can in certain circumstances be an impossible approach. [read post]
