Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Potter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Carter v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Puri Consulting Limited v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:02 am
A week ago, an item on this weblog ("IPKat rage over ECJ language issue") fulminated over the failure of the Curia website to furnish a version of the Advocate General's Opinion in Case C-497/07 Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH either in French or in English. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:22 pm
Plus there is a detour to Swift v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 6:41 am
Palomares v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Lumley v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:41 am
The Court held, following GIE Reunion Europeenne v Zurich Espana Case C-77/04, that the special regime for insurance did not apply to proceedings between co-insurers (by the same logic the special regime does not apply to disputes between reinsurer and reinsured – UGIC v Group Josi Reinsurance Company).Equally, after the insured under the policy had assigned its rights against the English Claimants to the French Defendants, the French Defendants did not thereby… [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 6:25 am
Some banking services carry an element of riskAbanka DD v Abanca Corporacion Bancaria SA [2017] EWHC 2428 is a recent High Court appeal from the UK's Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
Writing client-facing material using English as a second language? [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
In Correa v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
This Opinion is not yet available in English, but this Kat's computer didn't even wait to be instructed and turned the entire text into an unofficial but navigable English translation, on which the following is based.Coty Germany makes and sells perfumes and cosmetics in Germany, including a women's fragrance [As a Kat, Merpel has always found this term strange: it ought to mean 'the fragrance of more than one woman', while the thing being made and sold doesn't smell of women at… [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:25 pm
Eshelby v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
., Serial No. 86321169 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of GOLDENBERRY for "fresh fruits"].May 2, 2017 -2 PM: In re Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC, Serial Nos. 85179591 and 85179618 [refusal to register the mark shown below, in color and in black-and-white, for "restaurant services and restaurant carry-out services," without a disclaimer of LOBSTER].May 4, 2017 -2 PM: Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
