Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 2341 - 2360 of 30,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Zachary Fasman
On Monday, June 21, the Supreme Court in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am by Gene Quinn
In December 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in a standard essential patent (SEP) appeal involving Ericsson and TCL Communication Technology—a closely watched case that many thought would shed light on what constitutes a FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) offer of a licensing royalty rate relative to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
       By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner filed an appeal pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the District’s decision.The Appellate Division, sustaining the District’s action, noted that in addition to charges alleging excessive socializing and failure to complete assigned duties, Charge V, Specification 1, alleged that Petitioner stated that he "wanted to get a gun and go postal on this place. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner filed an appeal pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the District’s decision.The Appellate Division, sustaining the District’s action, noted that in addition to charges alleging excessive socializing and failure to complete assigned duties, Charge V, Specification 1, alleged that Petitioner stated that he "wanted to get a gun and go postal on this place. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Track municipal spending, the state's 160,000 contracts, billions in state payments and public authority data. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:32 am by Ted Frank
The Center for Class Action Fairness appealed the rubber-stamp approval, and, on Friday, filed a reply brief in the case. [read post]