Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 15,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2008, 8:37 am
” [Ed: Maybe Shadowy figure has read the book after all. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Back to Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
Townsend v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
The portion of this figure attributable to the stolen inventory was based on the retail rather than wholesale price for the stolen inventory. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:02 am
What is not moot, however, is that defendants should not believe that they can manipulate net worth figures in order to avoid a large punitive award or that they can rely on State Farm v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:00 pm
Cavel International v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:43 pm
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:42 am
The Board found that these combined features are “essential to the use or purpose of the article or affect[] the cost or quality of the article," Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:14 am
This is the interesting question that the US Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit recently addressed in Rentmeester v Nike. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
.[*]In “Facebook v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:50 am
City of Newport v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:32 am
On November 12, 2013, a limited damages retrial will start in the first Apple v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:49 pm
Through a comparison of Kierkegaard and Schmitt, the author presents two readings of the state of exception: the first centers on the figure of the sovereign, while the second centers on the figure of the martyr. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:54 pm
Back in 2012 the Valencia CF filed a registration for a figurative mark depicting a bat (see here). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:52 pm
We will not be the first to comment on the Eighth Circuit’s affirmance earlier this week of summary judgment in Boehm v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:29 am
LEXIS 65278, at 25.First, citing to the prior decision in Jaimez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:33 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:19 pm
So it's disappointing to see the play they give it today (subscription required) -- fewer than 500 words on page B4 -- when the jury ended the damages phase with a dollar figure that turns Mattel's win into a somewhat hollow victory. [read post]
