Search for: "Franks v. Franks" Results 2341 - 2360 of 6,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that Theodore Frank, who will argue before the court later this month in Frank v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 5:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Conclusory allegations of damages or injuries predicated on speculation cannot suffice for a malpractice action, and dismissal is warranted where the allegations in the complaint are merely conclusory and speculative” (Alexim Holdings, LLC v McAuliffe, 221 AD3d 641, 643 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see York v Frank, 209 AD3d 804, 807). [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:45 am by Walter Olson
Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen’s firm suing Apple, Google and many others over common web features [Atlantic Wire, Groklaw ("Allen v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
This decision shows the importance of full and frank disclosure to the FSA of all relevant information at both individual and firm level.The full decision can be found by clicking here. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland), heard 6 Mar 2019. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland), heard 6 Mar 2019. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:15 am
Guidance from case lawThe judge reviewed the IPCom v HTC Europe [2013] EWHC 52 (Pat) and Unwired Planet [2017] EWHC 3083 (Pat) decisions. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm by Gregory Schick
The Final Rules add a new section (v) to Item 402 of Regulation S-K that require certain public reporting companies to describe the relationship between the executive compensation actually paid by the company to its NEOs and the financial performance of the company over a specified time horizon and to disclose each of the following in a prescribed tabular format. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019… [read post]