Search for: "German v. German"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 5,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I've got "bear" in mind today, because I'm teaching District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Court rules Canadian business infringed U.S. trademark law https://t.co/0WzNRpdYSc -> Ninth Circuit Criticizes Attempts to Plead Around Secton 230–Kimzey v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:50 am
In Bips v Bips, 2016 WL 4529957 (E.D. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
”[1] The most recent Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision interpreting this “further processing exclusion,” Bridges v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 11:28 am
Several months ago, the arbitral tribunal in the matter of Philip Morris v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:47 am
” The case (GS Media v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:24 am
For example, also German procedural law provides for a flat-rate system. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
A closer look at Hospira v Cubist and daptomycin micellesIPKat returns to the Hospira v Cubist case to look in more detail at the claim relating to purifying daptomycin by altering by PH.* My My Mylan: The Trademark Silver Lining for Mylan's EPIPENMylan has recently come under fire for raising the price of the EPIPEN. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm
” In 1987, the Texas Supreme Court ruled in El Chico Corp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
For her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at the 1988 case Morrison v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:36 pm
The Federal Court also correctly held that the private law question of parental responsibility has to be answered by German law, including German private international law. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:09 pm
Austria (civil defamation), Bédat v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
It has a domain name ending ‘.de’ and there is a German language page. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
The Federal Court of Justice also refers to the corresponding understanding of the decision in re Improver Corporation v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Hoffman J), [1990] FSR 181 Rn. 289 of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales and confirms that German and English case law follow the same rules on this issue. [read post]
