Search for: "Hill v. United States"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 2,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2008, 12:08 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the Global week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or Pharma, Biotech & Chem' for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Canada/Africa: Apotex ships patented AIDS drugs to Rwanda under Canada's Access to Medicines Regime (CAMR) (Managing Intellectual Property) (GenericsWeb) Consolidation in the generic… [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
Hill delivered the decision. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 4:37 pm
"On Wednesday, the state of Louisiana is to file a brief of up to 4,500 words expressing its views on the merits of the issue raised its petition for rehearing in Kennedy v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:36 am
Good news if you have stock in the United States - boy can that country buy low. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:43 pm
This case involves an issue involving one of the parties to this suit.In my day as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, I heard quite a few very skilled advocates. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:52 pm
Here's a bit of context on GATS:As a member of the WTO, the United States has agreed to multiple treaties, including GATS. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Second and Sixth Circuits have concluded the hybrid-rights language in Smith is dicta. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Second and Sixth Circuits have concluded the hybrid-rights language in Smith is dicta. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
(The Violence Against Women Act of 1994, for example, was ruled in part unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:34 pm
The Court revisited the issue last year in Panetti v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 5:25 pm
The case of Schroer v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
McCain’s views may matter especially to Hillary Clinton supporters, many of whom are pro-choice; according to syndicated columnist Froma Harrop, “[T]hey’ll want to know this: Would McCain stock the Supreme Court with foes of Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
Hill, Jacqueline B. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
Boston Insulated Wire & Cable Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:41 pm
Julius Richmond, a distinguished health care professional who served as Surgeon General of the United States during the Carter Administration. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:12 pm
Messick, 2002 PA Super 117, 799 A.2d 793, 798 (Pa.Super. 2002); see also Bird Hill Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
