Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 2341 - 2360 of 18,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
However, a number of features placed In re T in a different category. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
” So I know what you’re thinking: If the opinion is devastating and if it correctly concludes that the president probably committed crimes, doesn’t that require a criminal investigation on the part of the Justice Department? [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
Snider [1925] A.C. 396 per Viscount Haldane), or, as Justice Jean Beetz put it, “a national emergency of the same significance as war, pestilence or insurrection”—including (and Beetz J. here dissented) double-digit inflation (Reference re Anti-Inflation Act, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
However, that did not stop the Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by Bush II appointee Chief Justice John Roberts, from holding in 2020 in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 4:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
In announcing the decision, Bavarian Justice Minister Georg Eisenreich said that freedom of thought "ends where criminal law begins. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
Yet the Senate is moving slowly, and the White House and the Justice Department have remained largely quiet. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:50 pm by Ray Giblett (AU) and Timothy Chan (AU)
In the appeal, LCA Marrickville Pty Ltd v Swiss Re International SE [2022] FCAFC 17, the Full Federal Court considered the construction of various business interruption insurance policies and whether they responded to losses sustained by a number of small businesses. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm by Andrew Hamm
Garland, the justices face the meaning of a “machinegun” and the role of deference under Chevron v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:45 am
"It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is," wrote Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]