Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)" Results 2341 - 2360 of 2,865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm by Orin Kerr
That new practice received an enthusiastic endorsement when the Ninth Circuit handed down its initial en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am by Danielle Citron
Wagner, later a United States Senator and a principal author of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the National Labor Relations Act (the “Wagner Act”), and Alfred E. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:04 am by Adam Schlossman
This morning, the Court issued orders from the Justices’ March 18 Conference, granting certiorari in two cases, inviting the views of the United States in one case, releasing a summary decision in one case, and providing a written statement respecting the denial of certiorari in one case. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am by Peter Tillers
Allen, Rainhard Bengez, Floris Bex, Scott Brewer, Craig Callen, James Franklin, David Hamer, Bruce Hay, Joseph Laronge, D. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Stefanie Levine
Another forum seeing an increase in use is the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:55 am
 Here I take no position on whether recent protect-the-speech-we-hate decisions like United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ March 18 conference. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm by Orin Kerr
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm by Orin Kerr
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:28 am by Susan Brenner
After reviewing several state and federal cases, it noted that in Gomez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
This judgment gave compensation to two prisoners because the UK had failed to implement the court’s decision in Hirst v UK (No. 2). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am by Matt Sundquist
  Finally, the Court often relies on the Solicitor General to help it to choose its cases by asking the Solicitor General – in a case in which the United States is not a party – to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
However, there were two additional interesting features about this case. [read post]