Search for: "LJ"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 2,387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
.* applying that approach in this case, Jacob LJ, for the Court of Appeal, said:"48. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:04 am
Tim Workman has been made CBE in the Queen's Birthday Honours, as has Dame Edna Everage's alter ego Barry Humphries.I wonder what they will talk about as they wait in the anteroom for their investiture? [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 4:21 pm
1) Sir Stephen's DNA is and will remain on file indefinitely. 2) The court's reasons for acquittal were impeccably expressed but are still unlikely to placate the 'it's a fix' brigade.3) A senior lawyer who knows all three parties on the bench as well as Sir Stephen says that this will set an irresistible precedent for DJs to sit with lay colleagues in the future. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:52 am
Sir Stephen Richards has been acquitted today of "flashing" on commuter trains. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:06 am
Lord Justice Richards has been cleared of the charges of indecent exposure. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
I discuss these points and more in my 1996 book American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics and my 1999 Yale LJ article in the symposium on Ackerman's second volume in the We The People series.With respect to the answers to the knotty problems of constitutional change, I prefer to follow the institutional and historicist path a bit further than Ackerman. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
This is clearly discriminatory against the other parent (usually the father) and, as Ward LJ pointed out in a recent case (quoted by Burrows): "justifiably fuels the passions of protesting fathers".This obviously needs to be addressed, and preferably, as Burrows suggests, by changing the rules throughout the tax credits and benefits system, rather than by leaving it to parents to 'pick off' each tax credit and benefit, one by one, through the tribunals/courts system. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:04 pm
Here are the two posts:The Organizational StructureWillingness to ServeIf you don't have an LJ account, you can subscribe by email with this handy free service.All you need to do is paste in the following URL:http://community.livejournal.com/fanarchive/rss(If you use an RSS newsreader, you can use that same URL to subscribe to the news feed.)You also do not need an LJ account to make comments on posts -- please just remember to put your name/pseud somewhere in your comment, so… [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:10 pm
Good thing LJ didn't catch me with "false advertising" as an overriding interest! [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:01 am
Less exciting than LJ censorship, and slightly late, but still significant: Rome II which seems to have been trundling on All My LIfe has finally reached a common agreement as of May 15 2007. the full text of the agreement does not yet seem to be available but many details are on Diana Wallis MEP's site.As I'm sure you all know, Rome II deals with harmonising choice of law rules in cross-jurisdiction tort (delict) cases just as Rome I did for contracts.Some interesting parts of… [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:17 am
Interesting climbdown.I guess that one can be chalked up as another, albeit belated, victory for the users in web 2.0 culture - rather as with AACS and Digg.It also makes it fairly plain that LJ's main worry was probably the appearance of locked communities to advertisers (where the visble content is mainly the "interests" - such as rape or paedophilia - rather than serious legal worries. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:52 pm
A rather more likely rumour is that LJ at first held firm, confident they were protected by the CDA, but panicked when WFI began going round their advertisers suggesting that LJ was not a nice place to hang out. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
.* Both the US and Sweden had become qualifying countries by the time the infringement took place.The IPKat admires their Lordships' careful reading of Part II of the Act, which is persuasive, in the face of what Toulson LJ calls the "seductively simple" submissions on behalf of the appellants. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:23 pm
Wright, Slotting Contracts and Consumer Welfare (forthcoming Antitrust LJ). [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:41 pm
Jacob LJ, in a leading judgment delivered today in the Court of Appeal in Intel v CPM, has referrred a number of questions on s.5(3) TMA 1994/Art.4(4)(a) Directive 89/104 to the ECJ. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:22 am
As Jacob LJ says (at para.26): "Nor does it help to ask whether a national court or the EPO is "top". [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:55 am
Library Journal article regarding the Yale Book of Quotations. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:03 am
” I have a lot of sympathy with the analysis of Buxton LJ, but Arden LJ, in the minority, disagreed. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:55 am
Read the LJ article and check out her wonderfully titled What I Learned Today… blog. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 3:20 pm
These readers (right) just couldn't wait to hear what the IPKat had to say about the Da Vinci Code caseThere's also bad news for lovers of certainty, with Mummery LJ stating: "The 1988 Act does not define "a substantial part" or even indicate what factors are relevant to substantiality. [read post]
