Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
Therefore, a policy which wouldn’t cover liability due to negligence could not properly be called comprehensive. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:51 am
Dram Shop defendants and their insurers pay $255,000 to settle. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 10:03 am
“The complaint fails” the Court stated, “to adequately put the [premises owner] defendants on notice of the particular conduct by the [premises owner] defendants that would warrant application of a strict liability standard. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 1:42 am
These costs erode the limits of liability of any applicable insurance, reducing the amount of insurance available for any other pending claims. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
In fact, Mais identified two categories of work in which “if we weren’t prepared to offer AFAs, we wouldn’t be getting hired for a significant portion of the work” – the representation of policyholders in insurance coverage work, and patent work in which the firm represents defendants who are sued by non-practicing entities. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:37 am
The insurance broker associated with the tax evasion has not been listed in the case. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:03 pm
Defendant asserts that he did not assume any contractual liability for the acts of Co-Defendant. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
Functionally: we should figure out the most effective switches to turn liability off. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
Equally problematic for Sony, it has been sued by its commercial general liability (CGL) insurer, Zurich American, which is seeking to avoid coverage by arguing that its general liability policies do not and never were intended to cover data breaches. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
This tactic has frequently been referred to as the delay, deny, and defend game designed to raise the bottom line profitability of insurance companies. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:00 am
Commonality and Typicality: The court found commonality and typicality satisfied, explaining that “[b]ecause Plaintiffs allege both a single practice or course of conduct on the part of each Defendant – the failure to implement a geocoding verification system – that gives rise to the claims of each class member and a single theory of liability . . . . [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am
In a different case, on June 29, 2012, the Seventh Circuit, applying Illinois law, held that when the defendants in a lawsuit include both persons who are insureds under the defendant company’s D&O policy and persons are not insureds, the policy’s Insured vs. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 6:19 am
Here is some background: Ulico Casualty Company issued a claims-made liability policy to the Allied Pilots Association (APA). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
You order their medical records and their billing records, and you notice that their insurer (it can be a private insurer or Medicare) refused to even pay for treatment of the infection as a “never event. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:06 am
Hiring an experienced wrongful death lawyer is important because we are trained to try to identify additional theories of liability and additional defendants which can trigger additional insurance coverage. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:54 am
Insurance company estimates indicate that dog bites cost insurance companies over $400 million in clams each year. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
This could include a liability that would not be covered by insurance that was applied for by the attorney assuming he or she was not part of a “firm. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:57 am
Now another New York court is raising the spectre of consequential damages in a liability case, asking whether Connecticut would recognize the right of insureds to sue for reputational damage and a loss of earnings potential based upon an insurer's failure to defend. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:31 am
I cannot understand why any professional would not have professional liability insurance. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:47 pm
In this case, the Court ruled that, “When an insurer has a duty to defend a liability claim for which it questions coverage, the insurer must expressly inform its insured that it accepts defense of the claim subject to its right to later contest coverage of the claim based on facts developed at trial. [read post]
