Search for: "Long v. Williams"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 4,808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
On Friday, the Second Circuit published its long-awaited decision in Authors Guild v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
The most tiresome and long-winded approach is likely to be to find some sort of serious defence or justification and then hope frantically that it sounds credible. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
By William W. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
In Stevens v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Yes, many thoughtful observers think that we put too many offenders in prison for too long. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
In today’s case (Zhibawi v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
For the second year in a row, none of the grants out of the Long Conference were relists, so we won’t mention them. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Bakke, so long as courts ensure that a meaningful substantive strict scrutiny approach is rigorously followed. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:13 pm
On Tuesday afternoon local time, Judge William H. [read post]
The BASMATI saga: General Court accommodates extended passing off within Community trade mark system
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
Earlier this week Katfriend Nigel Urwin (Lee Bolton Monier-Williams) brought to the IPKat's attention news of a case (Tilda Riceland Private v OHMI - Siam Grains (BASMALI), T-136/14) that the General Court (GC) decided on 30 September last, and appears to have some relevant implications particularly as far as that peculiar creature of UK common law known as extended passing off is concerned.Before going into the details of the decision, what is extended passing off? [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:25 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:25 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Illinois' Untold Story, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 24 (2016):Stanley v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
It's Cruel. http://t.co/NaXa78aNWa -> Gallagher v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:35 pm
I was very proud to participate in a CAC amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Overseas mail took a long time to reach its destination and, in the case of letter sent to French law firms in early August, even longer to be read. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:50 am
While the trial court relied on Williams v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In such cases, the Supreme Court has made clear in Washington v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
To her, the Court’s 2012 decision in Fisher v. [read post]
