Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2341 - 2360 of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
Article 57 states that an invention is susceptible of industrial application if it can be made or used in any kind of industry. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:24 am by JEMIMA LOVATT
The case was heard before Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes, Lady Black and Lord Lloyd-Jones on 18 Oct 2017. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:16 am by Rachit Buch
Flood v Times: how does this affect calls for libel reform? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
On the first day Pill LJ ruled that the evidence from the recent “Panorama” programme about Lord Ashcroft was inadmi [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:35 pm by INFORRM
Lord Triesman v UTV Media (GB), 9 Dec 2010. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
The court was persuaded In Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No. 2) [2004] 1 AC 816, Lord Hope stated at paragraph 106:- “… Article I of the First Protocol has a similar character [to Article 6(1)]. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
Are the famous words of Lord Hoffman in Kirin-Amgen that "life is too short" to consider the file, soon to ring hollow? [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:27 am by Andres
Lord Templeman stated: “My Lords, twin-tape recorders, fast or slow, and single-tape recorders, in addition to their recording and playing functions, are capable of copying on to blank tape, directly or indirectly, records which are broadcast, records on discs and records on tape. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The case of R. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:56 am by Charon QC
  John Cooper QC was brought in for the final appeal before the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
27 May 2013, 4:18 am by Barry Sookman
In this case, Mrs Sig neither had the trade secrets nor knew that they were being misused, and therefore she did not share one of the features of the design which rendered it wrongful, namely the necessary state of knowledge or state of mind. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:37 am by John O'Sullivan
So says the Court of Appeal in its reasons for decision in Biancaniello v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:00 am by Liam Thornton
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court decision, HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department the question that arose was whether a person had to be ‘discrete’ in relation to their sexuality so as to avoid persecution by the state. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:24 pm by Mathews P. George
I shall argue in affirmative relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Hardie Trading Ltd. and Anr. v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am by Bartolus
415/05 P Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I? [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
The House of Lords decision in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v. [read post]