Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am
Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 at 381; and see AXA General Insurance Ltd at [32] (Lord Hope DPSC) and [131] (Lord Reed JSC). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Global Aerospace v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Global Aerospace v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
On Wednesday 27 June 2012, a three judge Divisional Court, the Lord Chief Justice, Owen and Griffiths Williams JJ heard the “Twitter joke” case, Chambers v DPP. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Now, in a refreshingly short and direct speech of just 37 paragraphs, Lord Sumption put things right. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
In Lord v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
The reasoning used by the Illinois Supreme Court seems to mirror that of the famed Lord Wilberforce, who in the UK House of Lords decision of Blathwayt v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
The EBA, while being aware of the use of T258/03-Hitachi and T641/00-Comvik, stated circa May 2010: “We note, in passing, that it is somewhat surprising that the referral does not address any of its questions to the validity of this way of judging an inventive step, an issue which is surely of general interest (and one which Lord Justice Jacob proposed should be put to the Enlarged Board – “How should those elements of a claim that relate to excluded subject… [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
” Forrester v. [read post]
Golden Anniversary: The Supreme Court’s Engel Decision Protected Religious Liberty In Public Schools
22 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Supreme Court handed down a crucial church-state ruling in Engel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
He also speaks to senior appeal court judge Lord Justice Moses and asks about the best way to assess quality and what dangers lie ahead if suffers. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
“[V]ery serious violent offences” can outweigh an Art 8 claim “even if they were committed by a minor”. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
House of Lords Tuesday 19 June, 10.30am & 4pm, Defamation Bill Committee. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
XX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 742 (15 June 2012). [read post]
