Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2341 - 2360
of 21,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
”We deeply hope that state legislatures will not follow Mark Levin and Donald Trump, Jr. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:51 am
Here, Mark III needed a more definite written contract with Sysco, to prevent work from being taken from Mark III and its partner in responding to the RFP, BI.Mark III Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
” Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:36 pm
October 3rd marks the first day of the 2011 Supreme Court term. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:02 pm
Unfortunately for Teachbook, the dismissal Order also states that Teachbook “committed an intentional act by selecting a confusingly similar trademark to FACEBOOK,” nonetheless, this act was not enough to keep the lawsuit in the State of California. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Basically, the court has to explain why Mark Zuckerberg isn’t engaged in state action. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:18 pm
October 1st marks the beginning of the United States Supreme Court term. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:54 am
E Clampus Vitus v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:07 am
Tiffany Ferrara and WodSnob, LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:14 am
Use in the court of trade As stated above, the most interesting point discussed by Sir Alastair Norris was whether the activities of Merck US constituted use in the UK in the course of trade. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm
It’s the invention of Arizona entrepreneur Mark Phillips, whose company hopes to hit the market by spring. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:03 am
While the Sixth Circuit largely affirmed the trial court decision, the appeals court vacated a punitive damages award of $67,650 because the district court gave improper jury instructions (House v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:27 pm
Coty to support the truthful use of a mark to identify the topic of discussion. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:27 am
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:01 pm
Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc. (10th Cir., November 7, 2017) (affirming dismissal of Rael's state law harassment and emotional distress claims as preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act)Discrimination/Retaliation*Mitchell v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:31 pm
National Science Foundation (10th Cir., April 26, 2017) (denying Craine's petition for review: his disclosures, as a former employee of Kansas State University, did not fall within the whistleblower protections of 41 U.S.C. ss. 4712)*Jackson v. [read post]
