Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 2341 - 2360 of 9,188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2013, 1:16 pm by farrah nagrampa
Circuit erred in invalidating an EPA rule that implemented limits on cross-state air pollution, and Schuette v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:22 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
  In doing so, the Ninth Circuit reversed the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:55 am
  Half the monetary penalty goes to the person who instituted the suit and the other half goes to the United States government. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm by Thomas James
The United States Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:46 pm
United States, 469 U.S. 70, 75 (1984), there is scant legislative history, and certainly not enough to support an alternative reading in this case. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 2:07 pm by Likonelo Magagula (SA)
Evolation Yoga, LLC, Mark Drost, and Zefea Samson, Case No. 13-55763 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Kendi on Wilson.Friday marked the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Pittsburgh Tax Review, Forthcoming).From SSRN (Islamic Law):Mushtaq Ahmad, Revisiting the Discourse on Islam and Human Rights, (November 21, 2019).Muhtaq Ahmad, Discovering the Law without a Coherent Legal Theory: The Case of the Council of Islamic Ideology, (November 19, 2019).Ashraf Booley, Progressive Realisation of Muslim Family Law: The Case of Tunisia, (Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 22, 2019).Recent Books:Nathan Walker, The First Amendment and State Bans on… [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Roos & Anita Mackay, A Shift in the United Nations Human Rights Committee's Jurisprudence on Marriage Equality? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:30 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
First up on Monday morning is argument in Kahler v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia have barred such inventions from being patented. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rendered judgment last year, overturning the district court’s finding that the red soles could not be trademarked. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices are considering the limits of tax-law obstruction charges. [read post]