Search for: "Motion" Results 2341 - 2360 of 152,923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2022, 8:28 pm by Patent Docs
The basis for Sigma-Aldrich's Motion was that Broad's P1 application did not disclose a constructive reduction to practice of an embodiment within the scope of the Count... [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:02 pm by Tom Church
Last week, our firm filed a motion to dismiss the charges against our client who is charged with federal firearm trafficking offenses. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:57 am
In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff filed a motion to exclude the defendants' claim construction experts. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:46 am
Regarding Order No. 25, ALJ Luckern denied CompX’s summary determination motion concerning infringement. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 am by Alex Gasser
  The Commission Investigative Staff supported HP’s motion, noting that since HP does not have the burden of proof regarding validity, it has no affirmative duty to present evidence to prevail on its motion. [read post]
6 May 2007, 8:36 am
The motion which Plaintiff filed was entitled “Motion to Kiss My Ass” (Doc. 107) in which he moved “all Americans at large and one corrupt Judge Smith [to] kiss my got [sic] damn ass sorry mother f[…] you. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:33 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Additionally, Judge Nealon also found the Plaintiff’s motion to be untimely. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  A Rule 59.04 motion did not cure the deficiency in the initial affidavit. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:37 am by Hyemin Han
Former President Donald Trump opposed the Justice Department's motion in the Eleventh Circuit to expedite appeal of U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Brann denied a Plaintiff’s Motion to Bifurcate a trucking accident litigation with respect to the issues of liability and damages. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The decision denying the motions for summary judgment were by Order only. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The Plaintiff also asserted that the Defendant did not place, or even possess, emergency reflective triangles, fuses, or other warning devices required by federal and state law.After the Plaintiff secured evidence in support of these allegations during the course of discovery, including expert reports in which the experts concluded that the Defendant acted recklessly and with conscious disregard for safety of others, the Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend his Complaint to include a claim for… [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
  Appellant challenges all four of the motion judge’s conclusions The appellant appealed the decision, contesting all four of the motion judge’s conclusions. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
  Appellant challenges all four of the motion judge’s conclusions The appellant appealed the decision, contesting all four of the motion judge’s conclusions. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
“He heard the motion for summary judgment together with the certification motion and that’s very unusual,” she says.The parties had agreed to have the motions heard together but then the plaintiffs tried to change the schedule and wanted Strathy to defer the summary judgment motion. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
We have previously summarized the motions and responses filed in the Churchill v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
Today, the Texas Supreme Court issued an order denying ECUSA's motion for a stay or recall of its mandate pending ECUSA's request to the United States Supreme Court to review the Texas Court's decision in the Fort Worth case. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Accordingly, since the instant motion to quash here was not filed until nearly two months after the deadline, it was denied as untimely. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:01 am by Sarah M Donnelly
Army Corps of Engineers et al (D.D.C. 16-cv-01534): 131- Intervenor-Plaintiff’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment 131-1 Statement of Facts 131-2 Exhibit 131-3 Exhibit 131-4 Exhibit 131-5 Exhibit 131-6 Text of Proposed Order 133- Intervenor-Plaintiff Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Unopposed Motion for Expedited Briefing Schedule on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 133-1 Text of Proposed Order Link: Previously posted materials, other posts [read post]