Search for: "Next International, Inc." Results 2341 - 2360 of 4,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2010, 1:11 pm by WIMS
Access the statement from AIAM (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:28 pm by WIMS
President now is the time for us to take the next step. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:08 pm
Manpower International, Inc. and Wayne-Dalton Corp., 2001 WL 1923127 (N.D.Fla.), Wayne-Dalton corporation is a company that manufactures garage doors. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:22 am by Kristian Soltes
Even after the U.K. decision the next day led the parties to terminate the deal, the DOJ pressed on to the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: EPO Administrative Council fails to reach agreement on who should be next EPO President (IPKat) (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style opposition (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) Korean Intellectual Property Office announces super speedy… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: EPO Administrative Council fails to reach agreement on who should be next EPO President (IPKat) (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style opposition (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) Korean Intellectual Property Office announces super speedy… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: EPO Administrative Council fails to reach agreement on who should be next EPO President (IPKat) (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style opposition (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) Korean Intellectual Property Office announces… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  This case showed that passing off is a tort that can evolve.The next step in this evolution is post-sale confusion. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Beyond Intractability
Next, the convener must determine if and how these needs can be met. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
The rules strengthen employees’ incentives to report suspected violations internally through internal compliance programs. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Whether or not the small, heroic businesses, however, focused, efficient and effective they are, can survive to become the next MANZ, Edward Elgar or Lefebvre-Sarrut, before going under, if unlucky, or being acquired and losing their raison d’être, is a matter for speculation. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
PLS Financial Services, Inc., however, a federal district court and the Fifth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in a proposed class action presenting the very same litigation waiver question under almost identical factual circumstances, 689 Fed.Appx. 800 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam).How should these cases be counted? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by David Stanton, Wenqing Zhao
Another deal, between U.S. data analytics firm Cogint, Inc. and BlueFocus International Limited of China, was also scuttled after CFIUS indicated unwillingness. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm by Ray Dowd
Oman, 924 F.2d 346, 347-48 (D.C.Cir.1991); Atari I, 888 F.2d at 881; Coach, Inc. v. [read post]