Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:59 am
” Tsai-Yi Yang v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
It is difficult to conceive of a case that better fits this description than R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:39 am
On the other hand, Member States have the option to tax publications on any means of physical support at a reduced VAT rate (minimum 5%) and some Member States were granted the possibility to continue to apply VAT rates lower than the current minimum of 5% (super-reduced rates) including exemptions with the deductibility of the VAT paid at the preceding stage (so called zero rates) to certain printed publications.Readers may remember that, not long time ago, in the context of… [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am
The Charter pertains to state action. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:54 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 11:16 am
Scotiabank took the view, following Citi Cards Canada Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:03 am
¶64 (quoting Dent v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 9:42 am
(c) United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
’ Complaint ¶ 11(J.A. 5). [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
In the review, she stated, for the first time, that her sons had a fear of heights and that living on the 11th floor was impacting their mental health. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:50 pm
The court cited Moore v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:49 am
À cette occasion, elle devra prouver que les États-Unis n’ont pas eux-mêmes, par des procédures d’enquêtes internes, répondu aux allégations de torture et procédé à leurs propres poursuites au niveau national, en conformité avec le principe de complémentarité (Statut de Rome, Préambule, para 10). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
At the same time, in the end the court found both the first construction (that was also proposed by the infringer) and second construction (that the court ultimately accepted) problematic (para. 114). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
In the aftermath of Edwards v Cook, a number of patentees have successfully deployed creative arguments to avoid falling foul of an “Edwards v Cook”-style attack. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:22 pm
He noted at para. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:06 am
Del récord en vídeo de la vista del Comité, se desprende que la enmienda fue adoptada a viva voz. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:13 pm
This passage was also cited in Hijos v. [read post]
